RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03939
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His home of record (HOR) be changed.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His would like his HOR to be reflected as Highlands Ranch,
Colorado, rather than Colorado Springs, Colorado.
He provides no supporting documentation.
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document,
reflects his HOR as Highlands Ranch, Douglas, Colorado.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. After a phone conversation with the
applicant it was discovered that the applicant was asking for a
residential address change rather than a HOR change and was
directed to seek assistance from his servicing military
personnel section to get his residential address changed.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 13 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force Reserve Command office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-03939 in Executive Session on 20 Mar 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2013-03939 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Aug 13.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 5 Nov 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 14.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date in rank (DOR) to the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3) be changed to reflect his date of enlistment (DOE). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01639
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. Individuals must meet the following criteria for promotion to Airman, have six months time in grade (TIG) after entering Initial Active Duty Training (IADT) and to be eligible for promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04052
He be credited with the time remaining to secure 20 years of active duty service and a Regular Air Force retirement, or he be recalled to active duty status to allow him to receive a Regular Air Force retirement. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel notes that the applicant concurs with the recommendation to grant the requested relief and reaffirms the appropriate relief is to grant the applicant constructive service credit from the date of removal from active duty to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01630
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01630 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) be changed from 5 Mar 14 to 13 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02444
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends the applicants record be corrected to reflect he requested and received a reserve commission and transferred to the IRR when he separated from active duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPA recommends approval,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00579
On 15 Jan 13, the applicant signed DD Form 1966, Record of Military Processing Armed Forces of the United States. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They completed a careful review of all documentation regarding the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05229
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05229 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 22 Mar 12. The applicant would have been eligible for promotion to the grade of E-2 on 7 May 12, after completing Basic...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02153
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03317
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; medical records, letters of support, and other various documents associated with his request. Thus none of these conditions are In the Line of Duty (ILOD) as applied to Air Force disability retirement. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...